Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Business

North Dakota farmers question wind boom as Badger project sparks local backlash

Residents of Wishek, North Dakota, once supportive of Ørsted’s Badger Wind Farm now resent the turbines, citing visual impact and limited local benefit despite lease payments and tax revenue.

Ørsted’s Badger Wind Farm, a 250-MW installation with 92 turbines, began operating near Wishek, North Dakota, delivering lease checks of about $5,000 per turbine and $1.3 million in annual county tax revenue. Initially welcomed, the project now faces backlash from residents like Larry Wald and Lila Raile, who argue the turbines dominate the skyline and erode the town’s rural charm. They fault distant landowners who signed leases and claim local officials failed to protect the community, despite a $150,000 donation that funded a firehouse and pool.

McIntosh County imposed a one-year moratorium on further wind developments, and state leaders are questioning whether additional turbines threaten the coal sector. While some farmers, such as George Wolff, still support the all-of-the-above energy mix, the controversy highlights tension between economic incentives and perceived environmental and aesthetic costs.

Why it matters

The dispute shows how renewable projects can strain rural communities, influencing future energy policy and local economies.

In this story

wind powerBadger Wind Farmlease paymentstax revenuemoratoriumall-of-the-above energy policy
Get the beta ↗