Ohio Appeals Court Declares EdChoice Voucher Program Unconstitutional
The 10th District Court of Appeals ruled that Ohio's EdChoice school voucher program violates the state constitution, upholding a prior lower-court decision.
In May, the 10th District Court of Appeals unanimously held that Ohio's EdChoice school-choice initiative is unconstitutional, pointing to conflicts with the state's mandate for a single public education system and insufficient oversight. Despite the decision, Attorney General Andy Wilson obtained a stay, ensuring the program continues unchanged while he prepares an appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court. Wilson told Ohio residents that the ruling has no immediate impact and reaffirmed his belief that parents should be able to choose schools and that the General Assembly may lawfully support that choice.
The three-judge panel, including Judge David Leland, expressed worries about overlapping programs and the effect on rural students. Opposition groups, such as the Center for Christian Virtue, noted that fewer than half of Ohio’s districts joined the suit and that plaintiffs strategically chose a lower court known for favorable rulings. Pro-choice advocates like Troy McIntosh of the Ohio Christian Education Network warned that overturning EdChoice could affect about 180,000 students and highlighted poor reading and math proficiency rates as a backdrop. Governor Mike DeWine also criticized the appellate decision as legally incorrect and predicted the case would ultimately reach the Supreme Court.
How the sides frame it
MODERATE AGREEMENTBoth camps report the appellate court’s ruling that the EdChoice voucher program is unconstitutional and note the stay allowing it to continue, but right-leaning coverage frames the decision as a major setback to school-choice and highlights partisan concerns, while centrist coverage sticks to a straightforward factual account.
CENTER
Centrist coverage presents the ruling and stay in plain factual terms without evaluative language.
RIGHT
Right-leaning coverage portrays the decision as a significant blow to school-choice and underscores political reactions.
The right emphasises
- the ruling is a "big hit" to school choice in Ohio
- the decision was unanimous and raises concerns about oversight and impact on rural students
- Attorney General Andy Wilson stresses that parents should still be able to choose schools and that the program will continue while he appeals
