Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Pakistan spends nearly $6 million on Hague water dispute despite austerity cuts

Pakistan has devoted almost $6 million to fund its Hague arbitration against India over the Ratle and Kishenganga projects, even as its 2026-27 budget trims spending on flood control and other domestic water needs.

Pakistan’s latest budget allocates $7.9 million to its Indus Waters mission, dwarfing the $1.2 million set aside for flood-related agencies such as the Federal Flood Commission. Since 2016, the country has spent nearly $6 million on a Hague arbitration over India’s Ratle and Kishenganga hydropower projects, a figure that includes the amount the court requested from India, which has refused to pay or join the proceedings.

While India participates in World Bank-run expert meetings, it stays out of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which Pakistan continues to fund alone. The spending occurs amid a broad austerity program that has halved fuel allowances for official vehicles, banned new government car purchases and cut non-employee expenditures by 5%. Observers argue that the high legal costs, paid to London-based barristers and technical advisers, are opaque and outweigh the modest funding for domestic flood mitigation, highlighting a mismatch between national priorities and water-security needs.

Why it matters

It reveals how Pakistan prioritizes an expensive international legal fight over critical domestic water infrastructure during a fiscal squeeze.

In this story

Hague arbitrationIndus WatersPakistan budgetflood managementwater disputeausterity driveRatle projectKishenganga projectlegal costs
Get the beta ↗