Pentagon Mulls Tactical Nuclear Use in Russia or China Conflict, Raising Escalation Risks
Pentagon officials say they are considering a policy that would allow tactical nuclear weapons in a regional war with Russia or China, a move critics say could increase the chance of nuclear escalation.
Pentagon policymakers have revealed a draft shift in U.S. nuclear doctrine that would place the use of tactical, short-range nuclear weapons on the table in a regional clash with Russia or China, a change justified by Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby as providing “more rational nuclear options.” Opponents contend that once any nuclear weapons are employed, escalation to a full-scale exchange becomes far more probable, undermining deterrence rather than strengthening it.
The proposal arrives alongside a planned nuclear spending program of almost $1 trillion over ten years, featuring the new Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile, which former Secretary of Defense William Perry warned could force a president to decide within minutes of a false alarm. Critics urge a reduction of the U.S. stockpile to between 300 and 900 strategic warheads and a return to arms-control negotiations, noting that the lapse of the New START treaty leaves both sides “flying blind.”
With the midterm elections looming and the 2028 presidential contest beginning, candidates are being pressed on plans to lower nuclear risk. The article argues that cutting the arsenal would free hundreds of billions for other national priorities while enhancing security.
Why it matters
Expanding tactical nuclear options could raise the likelihood of a nuclear exchange and reshape U.S. defense spending.
In this story
