Polish parliament backs former minister Maciej Berek for Constitutional Tribunal seat
Poland’s lower house approved former minister Maciej Berek as a judge on the Constitutional Tribunal, sparking criticism from coalition partners.
On Friday, Poland’s parliament confirmed former cabinet member Maciej Berek as a judge on the Constitutional Tribunal, a body that has been largely inactive due to clashes over its composition. Berek, who left the Ministry for Government Policy Implementation in August, was lauded by Prime Minister Donald Tusk as competent, brave and selfless. However, lawmakers from the Left and centre-right factions within the ruling coalition condemned the appointment as hypocritical, noting a 2024 law that sought to bar politicians from moving straight into judicial roles.
NGO Democracy Reporting International’s Jakub Jaraczewski called the move a mistake, emphasizing the need for a clear separation between politics and the judiciary. President Karol Nawrocki, who has already limited the swearing-in of several tribunal judges, expressed doubts about Berek’s suitability, saying the court does not need another politician. Prosecutors have indicated they will question Nawrocki as part of an investigation into alleged unlawful obstruction of judges taking office.
Why it matters
The appointment raises concerns about political influence over Poland’s highest court and challenges promises of judicial reform.
How the sides frame it
HIGH AGREEMENTBoth camps report that Maciej Berek, described as the prime minister’s “right-hand man,” was elected to the Constitutional Tribunal and note criticism that the appointment breaches the government’s depoliticisation pledge, but right-leaning coverage stresses the conflict-of-interest and “judge-dubler” concerns more strongly.
CENTER
Centrist coverage presents the appointment as Tusk’s successful move that quelled a coalition rebellion, while noting critics’ claim it violates the pledge to depoliticise the court.
RIGHT
Right-leaning coverage frames the appointment as a politically-driven move that creates conflict of interest, risks a “judge-dubler” role, and undermines the government’s reform claims.
The right emphasises
- critics question Berek’s conflict of interest and “judge-dubler” potential
- appointment undermines government claims of restoring checks and balances
- vote created tension within the ruling coalition
In this story
