Prince Harry and Meghan land in Britain with children for surprise extended stay
Prince Harry and Meghan arrived at Birmingham International Airport with their two children, marking a surprise return to the UK after six years abroad.
Prince Harry and Meghan landed at Birmingham International Airport on a private flight from Van Nuys, California, accompanied by their son Archie, 7, and daughter Lilibet, 5. The couple relied on their personal security detail, and no police escort was observed as they left the airport. Their visit follows an announcement of an "extended" stay in Britain, though they remain non-working royals and will not resume official duties.
They intend to reside in a private, non-royal house outside London while retaining their home in California, and the children are set to enroll in British schools in September. King Charles III has been informed and is said to welcome more time with his grandchildren, while Prince William and Princess Kate have also been notified and are reportedly concerned about the sudden move. Kensington Palace declined to comment on private family matters.
Why it matters
The unexpected return of senior royals influences public interest and may affect the dynamics within the British royal family.
How this story developed
- Aug 19 Prince Harry and Meghan set to relocate to the United Kingdom
- Aug 20 The couple have now indicated a move back to the UK within weeks.
- Aug 20 Prime Minister Andy Burnham said security provisions for the Sussexes are a private matter.
- Aug 21 Prince Harry and Meghan have landed in the United Kingdom.
- Aug 21 Tax experts say the couple will forfeit four years of foreign income and gains relief and lose inheritance‑tax protection, exposing millions of dollars to a rate of up to 40 percent.
- Aug 22 Harry said returning to Britain was “impossible” yet announced plans to move back at the end of August.
- Aug 24 A new poll shows 68% of respondents want the couple to fund their own security while only 2% support taxpayer‑funded protection.
- Aug 26 A court ruling denied the Sussexes publicly funded protection, sparking debate over who will pay for their security.
In this story
Related stories
8 in this thread