Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Proposal Calls for Stripping Supreme Court Justices of Celebrity Perks

A new essay argues that Congress should eliminate special benefits for Supreme Court justices and treat them like lower-court judges.

In a recent Civitas article, the writer proposes that Congress make the Supreme Court less glamorous by imposing the same routine duties and living standards as lower-court judges. The suggestion includes banning special perks, prohibiting personal profit from the position, and requiring any royalties from books to be donated to the Holmes Devise. While salaries could be increased, the cost of living would align with other Washington judges who enjoy fewer benefits.

The author stresses that these measures would not affect the Court’s case load, rulings, or internal deliberations, but would aim to curb the “cult of judicial celebrity.” The piece argues that such reforms would reshape both judicial self-perception and public attitudes toward the Court’s stature.

Why it matters

It proposes changes that could reduce the Supreme Court’s public mystique and limit personal financial gains for justices.

In this story

supreme courtjudicial celebritycongressholmes devisecourt reformjudicial perkslower court judgessalary increaseoutside income
Get the beta ↗