Rødt's claim about SSB's focus on averages misrepresents its inequality work
A critique argues that Rødt’s criticism of Statistics Norway (SSB) for only using aggregate data overlooks the agency’s extensive research on poverty and income gaps.
In a response to a column, the author highlights that Statistics Norway (SSB) does not limit its work to macro-level averages but produces comprehensive studies on income distribution, poverty among families with children, and the financial strain on renters versus homeowners. While Rødt’s representative cited a statement about SSB’s focus on overall trends, the broader body of SSB research contradicts the notion that inequality is ignored.
The article also discusses how people’s subjective views of inflation and wage growth often skew more negative than official statistics, a bias documented in a Norges Bank expectations survey. Various methodological challenges in measuring both subjective and objective economic indicators are acknowledged. Nonetheless, the piece affirms that many respondents genuinely experience tighter budgets, underscoring the relevance of detailed statistical insight for Rødt’s class-based agenda.
Why it matters
Accurate interpretation of official statistics is crucial for informed debate on economic inequality and policy.
In this story
