Report Finds Liberal Dominance in U.S. Election Law Academia Influences Court Battles
A new study by the Public Interest Legal Foundation says liberal professors vastly outnumber conservatives in election-law programs at ABA-accredited schools, shaping the pool of litigators.
The Public Interest Legal Foundation examined election-law curricula and faculty at every ABA-accredited law school, finding liberal professors outnumber conservatives by about seven to one. Among the few schools offering dedicated election-law classes, the count of left-leaning instructors was 76 versus 12 conservatives, with most programs situated in blue states like New York and California. The study claims roughly 70% of election-law courses are taught by faculty identified as having a liberal ideological bias, training students to contest voter-ID rules, redistricting, and other election-integrity statutes.
Graduates then move into liberal-aligned nonprofits and large firms, creating a courtroom advantage for the left, which the report says can be seen in hearings where conservative lawyers are outnumbered five-to-seven-fold. The foundation suggests establishing election-law centers in red-state universities as a remedy, noting that Texas currently lacks such programs. While the report does not claim every liberal professor drives case outcomes, it contends the academic imbalance contributes to a self-reinforcing disparity in election litigation resources.
Why it matters
The study highlights how academic bias may affect the balance of legal representation in election disputes nationwide.
In this story
