Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Report Finds Liberal Dominance in U.S. Election Law Academia Influences Court Battles

A new study by the Public Interest Legal Foundation says liberal professors vastly outnumber conservatives in election-law programs at ABA-accredited schools, shaping the pool of litigators.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation examined election-law curricula and faculty at every ABA-accredited law school, finding liberal professors outnumber conservatives by about seven to one. Among the few schools offering dedicated election-law classes, the count of left-leaning instructors was 76 versus 12 conservatives, with most programs situated in blue states like New York and California. The study claims roughly 70% of election-law courses are taught by faculty identified as having a liberal ideological bias, training students to contest voter-ID rules, redistricting, and other election-integrity statutes.

Graduates then move into liberal-aligned nonprofits and large firms, creating a courtroom advantage for the left, which the report says can be seen in hearings where conservative lawyers are outnumbered five-to-seven-fold. The foundation suggests establishing election-law centers in red-state universities as a remedy, noting that Texas currently lacks such programs. While the report does not claim every liberal professor drives case outcomes, it contends the academic imbalance contributes to a self-reinforcing disparity in election litigation resources.

Why it matters

The study highlights how academic bias may affect the balance of legal representation in election disputes nationwide.

In this story

election lawlaw school pipelineliberal dominanceconservative underrepresentationcourt litigationvoter IDredistrictingacademic bias
Get the beta ↗