Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Health
CROSS-SPECTRUM

Researchers warn that menstrual tracking apps make unsupported health claims

Scientists from Harvard and Mälardalens universitet say femtech apps lack scientific proof for training or diet advice and may expose users to privacy risks.

Harvard researchers together with Cecilia Fridén, a physiotherapy professor at Mälardalens universitet, have highlighted that femtech applications marketed for optimizing workouts or diet based on menstrual cycle phases are not backed by scientific research. While elite athletes may find value in knowing their period timing, there is no proven link between specific training types and cycle stages. The team, whose findings appear in BMJ, also warns that these apps request sensitive personal information, which could lead to privacy concerns and undue anxiety for users.

They advocate for clearer ethical guidelines and greater user education regarding data handling. Despite the lack of evidence, the apps remain popular on platforms like TikTok, where many claims are not scientifically grounded. The researchers stress the need for more rigorous studies before such recommendations are promoted.

Why it matters

Misleading health advice and data privacy risks affect many women using menstrual tracking apps.

In this story

femtechmenstrual tracking appstraining optimizationdata privacyscientific evidencewomen's health
Get the beta ↗