Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed faces criticism for 2011 study on Arab interethnic births
Left-wing Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed is being attacked after a 2011 Columbia University paper suggested Arab women have better birth outcomes when partnered with Arab men.
Abdul El-Sayed, a Democratic Senate candidate, authored a 2011 Columbia University paper that concluded Arab women experience higher risks of preterm birth when partnered with non-Arab fathers. The research, appearing in the Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, found an 18% higher chance of births before 37 weeks and a 24% increase in births between 34 and 36 weeks for such couples. While the study noted no significant difference for very preterm births, it emphasized broader health concerns tied to interethnic mating.
The paper has been denounced as pseudoscience with a racist and eugenic slant by several public figures. El-Sayed, who identifies as a physician despite not finishing a residency, is campaigning to become the first Muslim U.S. senator.
Why it matters
The controversy highlights how past academic work can influence a political candidate's credibility and public perception.
How this story developed
- Oct 9 Rogers attacks El-Sayed’s mother over past charity work in heated Michigan debate
- Oct 16 El‑Sayed publicly denied any Muslim Brotherhood connections on live television.
In this story
Related stories
8 in this thread