Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

South Australian child protection agency placed three kids with relatives despite mothers' objections

The SA Department for Child Protection informally moved three children to family members without using formal removal powers, contrary to the mothers' wishes, according to the state Ombudsman's report.

A recent Ombudsman report concluded that the South Australian Department for Child Protection acted in error by informally relocating three children to family members against the explicit wishes of their mothers. In two instances, the department used "safety plans"—normally collaborative agreements—to place children with another parent or close relative, despite the mothers' consistent disagreement and without invoking formal statutory removal powers.

The third case involved an infant placed with the father while the mother, whose mental health was a concern, also opposed the move; the department proceeded without a safety plan or formal removal. The Ombudsman described these actions as administrative errors that breached internal policies requiring genuine collaboration with parents. Acting Chief Executive Darian Shephard-Bayly welcomed the findings and said the agency is updating its practice manual and other procedures to prevent recurrence.

Why it matters

It highlights procedural failures in child protection that can undermine parental rights and trust in government services.

In this story

child protectionsafety plansadministrative errorparental disagreementformal removal powersSouth Australian childrendepartment policy
Get the beta ↗