State-Level Producer Responsibility Laws Could Spur Greener Packaging if Rules Align
Several U.S. states have adopted extended producer responsibility statutes that shift packaging waste costs to manufacturers, but fragmented regulations limit their effectiveness.
Extended producer responsibility (EPR) policies, based on the “polluter pays” principle, are moving from Europe to the United States, where seven states have passed laws since 2021 that obligate major brands such as General Mills and PepsiCo to finance the collection and processing of their product packaging. The approach shifts waste-management costs from municipalities to producers, with the expectation that manufacturers will redesign packaging to lower fees.
However, a recent survey of waste-policy experts shows that U.S. efforts are fragmented, with differing objectives—some focus on funding recycling infrastructure, others on reducing environmental impact through design changes like reusable or compostable containers. Innovative tools like eco-modulation reward use of recycled material and penalize hard-to-recycle labels, yet without nationwide consistency, a compostable bottle may be rewarded in one state and penalized in another. Coordinated standards could strengthen the incentive for companies to create truly sustainable packaging, turning compliance fees into a driver of greener product design.
Why it matters
Uniform rules would help companies redesign packaging, cutting waste and environmental damage.
In this story
