States Ask Judge to Stop Federal Government From Filing Duplicate SNAP Lawsuits Nationwide
A coalition of 21 states and D.C. urged a California judge to block the Justice Department from pursuing similar lawsuits over SNAP data requests in other districts.
A group of 21 states and the District of Columbia, fronted by California, filed a motion in the Northern District of California seeking an injunction that would prevent the Justice Department from filing parallel suits in dozens of other federal courts over the government's demand for SNAP recipients’ personal data. Attorney Liam O’Connor warned that the government’s strategy could involve as many as 23 additional district courts, leading to duplicated filings and conflicting decisions.
Judge Maxine M. Chesney acknowledged the concern but hesitated to dictate what other judges may hear, suggesting she would likely reject the states’ request. The underlying case, launched in June 2025, alleges that the Trump administration is building a database to target immigrants, while the administration maintains the request supports fraud investigations and transparency. Previously, Judge Chesney has issued temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions blocking the government from tying SNAP funding to data disclosure.
The Justice Department, represented by Tyler Becker, contended the new suits are distinct and accused the states of forum shopping. The judge indicated she will issue a final ruling soon.
Why it matters
The outcome will shape how federal privacy rules for food-assistance recipients are enforced across the United States.
In this story
