Study finds Utah's mail-ballot system as secure as in-person voting
A $100,000 study commissioned by Utah GOP lawmakers concluded that the state's mail-in voting system is no less secure than traditional in-person voting, and that both methods share similar risks.
Utah Valley University scholars completed a taxpayer-funded $100,000 review of the state's election infrastructure after Republican legislators demanded proof of widespread mail-ballot fraud. Their analysis, which included Arkansas, Tennessee, Arizona, Colorado and Washington, determined that mail voting is not intrinsically more vulnerable than in-person voting, with both systems facing comparable security concerns. The report evaluated three options for adding ID verification at ballot drop boxes—staffed checks, smart drop boxes with photo capture, and a digital ID program—each presenting significant expense and implementation hurdles.
Lawmakers had earlier introduced legislation to shift Utah to an opt-in mail-ballot system by 2029, but after the study’s presentation to the Government Operations Interim Committee, no further changes were discussed. The findings arrive amid ongoing partisan debates over mail voting both within Utah and across the United States.
Why it matters
The study counters claims of mail-ballot fraud and informs policy decisions on election security.
In this story
