Supreme Court declines to unfreeze TMC faction's frozen bank accounts
The Supreme Court refused to grant relief to the Mamata Banerjee-led TMC faction seeking to operate four bank accounts frozen in a money-laundering probe, deferring to the Calcutta High Court’s pending hearing.
The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a petition from the Mamata Banerjee-led Trinamool Congress faction that asked for permission to use four bank accounts frozen in connection with a land-allotment money-laundering investigation. Justices MM Sundresh and PB Varale said they would not examine the merits because the Calcutta High Court is still hearing the case and scheduled further arguments after the Puja holidays. The faction, represented by senior lawyers Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Shoeb Alam, claimed it requires about ₹19 crore each month for operational costs, especially with an upcoming October 6 by-election, and noted an administrator has been appointed to manage expenditures.
The state’s solicitor general Tushar Mehta pointed to serious charges, including a claim that Sumit Roy, personal secretary to lawmaker Abhishek Banerjee, deposited a “huge” ₹35 crore cash amount. Rebel faction counsel K Parmeshwar argued that until the Election Commission decides which group is the legitimate TMC, neither side should control the accounts. The court warned that any opinion on the merits could affect the pending high court proceedings. The Election Commission recently assigned the Mamata-led faction the name “Mamata All India Trinamool Congress” and a football symbol for the by-polls, while the rival received the “Democratic Trinamool Congress” name and an envelope symbol.
Why it matters
The decision keeps the disputed party funds frozen, affecting the TMC faction’s ability to finance its election campaign.
How the sides frame it
LOW AGREEMENTLeft-leaning coverage focuses on the Supreme Court's procedural refusal to hear the TMC faction's petition, while centrist coverage highlights internal party dissent and calls for political realignment.
LEFT
Coverage stresses the court's dismissal of the petition on procedural grounds and notes the faction's claim of needing funds for upcoming elections.
CENTER
Coverage stresses party infighting, with leaders decrying politics as a dumping ground for anti-social elements and urging a return to Congress.
The left emphasises
- court declined to examine merits because the case is pending in the Calcutta High Court
- the faction claims it requires about ₹19 crore each month for operational costs ahead of an October 6 by-election
- the Supreme Court refused to hear the plea under Article 136
In this story
Related stories
6 in this thread