Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Crime & Justice

Supreme Court dismisses POCSO case against West Bengal teacher for corporal punishment

The Supreme Court ruled that a West Bengal teacher's corporal punishment of two Class 10 girls does not qualify as a POCSO offence, and quashed the criminal case.

In a September 8 order, the Supreme Court set aside a POCSO case against a geography teacher in Alipurduar, West Bengal, concluding that his corporal punishment of two Class 10 students did not involve the sexual intent needed for an offence under Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. The bench, comprising Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Atul S Chandurkar, noted that the teacher had hit the girls on their upper backs and waist and slapped them for not carrying maps, actions that were insensitive but not sexual.

The allegations emerged after female staff reported complaints on June 24, 2025, leading to an FIR on July 23, 2025. Statements recorded under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita failed to establish sexual intent. The court deemed further prosecution an abuse of process, overturning the Calcutta High Court’s April 27 order and cancelling the pending trial at the special court in Alipurduar.

Why it matters

The ruling clarifies that non-sexual corporal punishment cannot be prosecuted under POCSO, shaping future child-protection and school-discipline cases.

In this story

supreme courtpocsocorporal punishmentwest bengal teacherclass 10 girlssection 10child protection
Get the beta ↗