Supreme Court tactics shield Trump from legal challenges, experts say
Legal scholars argue the Court’s procedural tools are being used to protect Donald J. Trump from accountability.
They analyze specific controversies, including the White House ballroom litigation and efforts to disrupt mail-in voting ahead of the midterms, noting shifts from Trump’s earlier presidency.
The hosts also consider which justices are concerned about the Court’s credibility. The program pays homage to Gloria Steinem, highlighting her legacy, and features an interview with legal scholar Michele Goodwin, who serves as executive producer for Ms. Studios.
Why it matters
It shows how Supreme Court procedures can affect political accountability and public trust.
In this story
supreme courtprocedural tacticsstandingripenesspurcell principleshadow dockettrump accountabilitymail-in votinggloria steinemlegal analysis
