Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Technology
UNDERREPORTED

Supreme Court to weigh 1988 video privacy law in modern internet dispute

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act can be applied to online data-sharing practices, after a lawsuit alleges a newsletter sign-up led to Facebook targeting.

In 1988 Congress passed the Video Privacy Protection Act following a scandal over a judge’s video-rental records. Decades later, the law is being tested in a case where Michael Salazar says Paramount disclosed his newsletter subscription details to Facebook for targeted ads, invoking the Act’s consumer definition. Paramount counters that the statute was intended solely for video-service transactions and should not extend to non-video services like email newsletters.

The Motion Picture Association filed an amicus brief warning that an expansive interpretation could turn almost every internet user into a protected consumer, given the ubiquity of video content. The News/Media Alliance cautioned that a ruling in Salazar’s favor could force news sites to remove videos, paywall them, or abandon ad-based revenue models. Oral arguments before the Supreme Court are scheduled for Oct. 14, a decision that could reshape digital advertising and privacy law.

Why it matters

The ruling could redefine how privacy statutes apply to modern online advertising and data sharing.

In this story

Video Privacy Protection Actonline advertisingdata sharingprivacy lawSupreme Courttargeted adsdigital privacyconsumer definition
Get the beta ↗