Swiss government opposes stricter constitutional definition of neutrality before vote
Switzerland's federal administration rejected a proposal to hard-line the nation’s neutrality ahead of a September referendum.
Switzerland's government dismissed a drive to codify a rigid, perpetual neutrality in the constitution, stating the present framework already satisfies global standards. The initiative, backed by the right-wing Swiss People's Party, aims to enshrine an armed neutrality and prohibit joining any military alliances or imposing sanctions unless sanctioned by the United Nations. Proponents have gathered more than 100,000 signatures to force a referendum scheduled for September 27.
A recent Tamedia poll indicated that only about one-third of voters support the measure, with a clear majority against it. Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis warned that the proposed wording would limit Switzerland’s flexibility in security cooperation, restricting assistance to situations where the country is directly threatened. He emphasized that waiting for a crisis before cooperating would be too late. The vote will decide whether the constitution must be amended to reflect these stricter terms.
Why it matters
The outcome will determine if Switzerland narrows its diplomatic and security options by tightening its neutrality definition.
In this story