Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Health

Sydney patient outraged after surgeon given only reflection task for non-consensual ops

Catherine Shakespeare discovered two surgeries were performed without her consent and, after filing a complaint, the NSW health regulator ordered only a reflection letter from the surgeon.

In 2013, Sydney resident Catherine Shakespeare had surgery for a uterine prolapse performed by gynaecologist Alan Lam. She later discovered that Lam had also removed asymptomatic endometriosis and carried out a posterior vaginal wall repair and rectal wall repair without her prior consent, leading to a recto-vaginal fistula and a period living with a colostomy bag. Seeking answers, she filed a complaint with the NSW Health Care Complaints Commission in October 2021.

An expert peer review criticised the unsanctioned procedures, and the case was referred to the Medical Council, which, noting the elapsed time and no immediate public risk, ordered only that Lam write a reflection on the incident. Lam denied the allegations but later issued an apology through his insurer. Shakespeare remains angry, saying the regulator’s response fell short of an apology or accountability, and she is preparing for further surgery to address ongoing complications.

Why it matters

The case highlights concerns about informed consent and regulatory accountability in medical practice.

In this story

uterine prolapsenon-consensual surgerymedical consentreflection letterNSW health regulatorrecto-vaginal fistulapatient complaintmedical councilAlan Lam
Get the beta ↗