Tasmanian Parliament urged to rewrite controversial child-sex-offender disclosure bill
A parliamentary inquiry has recommended that the proposed “Daniel’s Law” be withdrawn and redrafted due to risks of false safety perceptions and potential harm to offenders and survivors.
Lawmakers in Tasmania are facing criticism over “Daniel’s Law,” a bill named after murdered 13-year-old Daniel Morcombe that would allow parents to query police about the sex-offender status of people who regularly care for their children. A parliamentary inquiry concluded that the scheme could generate false reassurance, exacerbate stigma, and potentially raise the likelihood of reoffending by fostering social isolation and vigilantism.
The report also questioned whether offenders who committed crimes as minors or sex-workers with children should be listed. Inquiry chair Ella Haddad urged the bill’s withdrawal and a fresh draft, citing risks to children and survivors. Police Minister Felix Ellis argued the measure has broad support and mirrors similar laws in other states, insisting it is essential for child safety. Daniel’s parents, Bruce and Denise Morcombe, expressed disappointment but remain hopeful the legislation can be salvaged.
Why it matters
The proposal could reshape how communities identify sex offenders, affecting child safety and civil rights.
In this story
