Transgender health body claims its care guidelines are merely opinions amid FTC suit
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health told a court that its Standards of Care are opinions, not factual assertions, as it seeks dismissal of an FTC lawsuit alleging deceptive claims about youth treatment.
WPATH filed a brief asserting that its widely-cited Standards of Care represent expert opinions based on cited studies, not definitive facts, and therefore enjoy First Amendment protection. The filing seeks to dismiss an FTC lawsuit, joined by four U.S. states, that alleges the group made false or unsubstantiated statements about the effectiveness and safety of puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and gender-affirming surgeries for children.
Opponents, including the Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine, contend that WPATH has long presented its guidance as the definitive standard, influencing Canadian policies and the Canadian Paediatric Society’s position. The organization maintains that its guidelines are flexible, allowing clinicians to deviate when warranted, and that many health authorities worldwide still endorse the evidence supporting SOC-8. The FTC argues the group’s claims were deceptive, while WPATH says the lawsuit attempts to silence one side of a legitimate scientific debate. The dispute highlights ongoing uncertainty and polarized views over pediatric transgender care.
Why it matters
The case could reshape how medical guidelines are presented and regulated, affecting care for transgender youth.
In this story
