Trump's Iran sanctions plan criticized for exempting Russia and China
A columnist argues that President Trump’s new Iran sanctions strategy is undermined by his willingness to overlook Russia and China, weakening its credibility.
In a recent column, Steve Benen criticized President Trump’s renewed sanctions policy toward Iran, saying it reverts to older tactics of economic isolation but is compromised by the president’s hints of selective enforcement. During an Oval Office signing, Trump answered questions about applying the measures to Russia and China by saying it “depends,” while praising Russia’s behavior in the Strait of Hormuz. Benen highlighted intelligence reports that Russia is supplying drone components and money to Iran, and noted Trump’s tendency to accept Russian denials and defend its actions.
The columnist described the president’s stance as drawing a red line and then granting a pass to friendly powers that cross it. He warned that such mixed signals could further erode U.S. leverage as the six-month Iran war drags on. The piece concludes that signaling weakness may not help the United States in its broader strategic goals.
Why it matters
Selective enforcement of sanctions could diminish U.S. credibility and affect the outcome of the Iran conflict.
In this story
