UK Justice Secretary reverses plan to limit jury trials in crown courts
Justice Secretary Alex Norris announced a reversal of the proposal to expand judge-only trials, keeping most criminal cases before juries.
Andy Burnham has ordered the abandonment of a controversial reform that would have broadened judge-only trials in crown courts. Justice Secretary Alex Norris explained the change as a response to widespread opposition, limiting the new rule to specific fraud and financial crimes. The original scheme, backed by former justice secretary David Lammy, aimed to reserve juries for serious indictable offences and divert lesser cases to a single judge.
Law Society president Mark Evans warned that moving more cases to magistrates’ courts may strain an already overloaded system. Victims’ Commissioner Claire Waxman expressed concern that victims are still asked to rely on a plan previously deemed insufficient. Several political figures, including Nick Timothy and Sian Berry, hailed the decision as a win for fairness and access to justice.
Why it matters
The reversal preserves the right to jury trials, affecting how criminal cases are processed and impacting court backlogs.
How the sides frame it
LOW AGREEMENTLeft-leaning coverage praises the reversal as a welcome protection of jury trials, while right-leaning coverage condemns the U-turn as a disastrous ‘car crash’ that will overload lower courts; Centrist coverage reports the move as a controversial U-turn without strong judgment.
LEFT
Frames the reversal as a positive, necessary safeguard of jury trials and a rejection of an authoritarian-leaning proposal.
RIGHT
Frames the reversal as a chaotic, harmful decision that will flood lower courts with cases they are ill-equipped to handle.
The left emphasises
- welcome
- protection of jury trials
- essential protection against an authoritarian state
The right emphasises
- "car crash"
- push thousands more cases onto magistrates' courts
- volunteer magistrates are "completely unequipped to try"
In this story
