US Fish and Wildlife Service Revises ESA Rules, Removing Threatened Species Protections and Redefining “Harm”
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced rule changes that drop automatic protections for threatened species and eliminate the agency-defined meaning of “harm,” which previously covered habitat damage.
In a recent announcement, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service unveiled revisions to the Endangered Species Act that eliminate the automatic safeguards for threatened species, meaning protections must now be crafted individually and could be delayed. At the same time, the agency withdrew its regulatory definition of “harm,” which had encompassed habitat modification, and is instead leaning on a dissenting opinion from a 1990s Supreme Court case.
Critics argue the changes undermine decades of recovery work for species like gray whales, the southern resident orcas, and salmon, especially as the agency faces staffing shortages. The rollback may also impact the restoration economy, tribal treaty rights, and broader ecosystem services that support human health and commerce. Legal challenges from NGOs and tribes are already forming, and a bipartisan House bill seeks to overturn the rule. Observers stress that public engagement and voting are crucial to counteract the policy shift.
Why it matters
Weakening ESA rules could leave many endangered species and related jobs unprotected, affecting ecosystems and communities.
In this story
