Washington should curb Iran with precise strikes and support for its people, not full-scale war
The analysis urges the United States to rely on limited military hits and economic pressure while helping Iranians keep communication open, avoiding a broad war that could let Tehran rally its citizens against America.
The piece contends that the United States should adopt a strategy of precise attacks on Iranian military facilities and heightened economic sanctions, while facilitating Iranians’ access to uncensored communications, instead of pursuing a full-scale war. It cites recent U.S. strikes on rocket launchers on Larak Island and Iran’s missile launches at U.S. bases in Jordan as examples of calibrated force. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is increasingly concerned about rising popular discontent, which the regime seeks to attribute to external enemies.
A broader conflict would allow Tehran to portray internal protests as foreign-instigated, uniting the populace against America. Maintaining a shipping corridor through the Strait of Hormuz and cutting off Iran’s illicit revenue streams are also emphasized. Ultimately, the recommendation is to deny the regime resources, conduct specialized strikes when needed, and support tools like Starlink that expose repression.
Why it matters
A mis-calculated U.S. approach could empower Tehran to turn Iranian anger into anti-American sentiment, escalating regional tension.
In this story
