Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Washington therapist's gender-counseling case sent back to court after Supreme Court ruling

A Washington marriage-and-family therapist will have his challenge to a 2018 state law restricting gender-related counseling reconsidered after a recent Supreme Court decision.

In 2018 Washington enacted a law that prohibited counselors from providing gender-related support to minors seeking comfort with their biological sex, a provision that Brian Tingley challenged in 2021. After the district court dismissed his claim and the Supreme Court declined to hear it in 2023, the high court’s March 2026 decision in Chiles v. Salazar, which struck down a comparable Colorado statute as viewpoint-based censorship, created new precedent.

Alliance Defending Freedom filed a motion to revive Tingley’s case, and the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington agreed on July 31, granting a preliminary injunction that restores his ability to counsel according to his beliefs. Senior counsel Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse described the move as a significant victory against forced-viewpoint legislation. State Senator Marko Liias, who sponsored the original bill, declined comment but said he would follow up later. The case now awaits further arguments, with the outcome poised to affect how Washington regulates gender-related counseling.

Why it matters

The ruling could reshape legal limits on how counselors discuss gender issues with minors across the U.S.

In this story

counseling censorshipWashington lawgender-related distressSupreme CourtChiles v. SalazarAlliance Defending Freedompreliminary injunctionSB 5722
Get the beta ↗