Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics
UNDERREPORTED

Whistleblower says ICE’s rapid hiring left agents insufficiently vetted, risking security

A senior ICE official filed a whistleblower complaint alleging that the agency hired hundreds of agents without completing background checks, creating serious national-security concerns.

An anonymous ICE official responsible for vetting new hires lodged a whistleblower complaint that the agency hired more than 12,000 agents with minimal background screening, citing a “grave national security risk.” The complaint, says the Trump administration’s hiring surge let candidates receive job offers before fingerprints, polygraph tests, or full background checks were completed, and reduced the standard ten-week academy to six weeks.

Former ICE counsel Ryan Schwank previously warned that recruits were being ordered to conduct warrantless home entries, describing the training as “deficient, defective and broken.” The accelerated hiring coincided with a surge in lethal incidents involving ICE officers, including the killings of Renee Good, Alex Pretti, Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero and Lorenzo Salgado Araujo. In response, ICE has reinstated the 72-day training program and mandated a follow-on Advanced Field Officer Training for those hired under the fast-track system. Homeland Security officials maintain that current vetting procedures comply with security guidelines and that on-the-job mentorship continues after academy graduation.

Why it matters

Improperly screened law-enforcement officers could jeopardize public safety and undermine trust in immigration enforcement.

In this story

ICE hiringwhistleblower complaintbackground checksfast-track traininglaw enforcementimmigration enforcementagency standards
Get the beta ↗