Why Government Policies, Not Free Markets, Drive the $20 Burrito
An opinion piece argues that soaring food prices are the result of expansive fiscal policy and regulation rather than pure market forces.
Drawing a parallel to the Continental Army's devalued currency, the column contends that current high prices stem from government-induced money expansion and regulation. It cites roughly $5 trillion in pandemic aid, Federal Reserve debt monetization, and a 26.9% year-over-year rise in M2 as the monetary backdrop for a 40% price jump at McDonald’s between 2019 and 2024. State-level mandates, like California’s $20 fast-food minimum wage, are shown to have nudged fast-food costs up 3.3%-3.6% and triggered job cuts and automation.
Housing costs are inflated by zoning and permitting rules that now add about $131,734—26.4% of a new home’s price. Federal student-loan policies have similarly pushed tuition higher. The author points to market corrections, such as Lennar’s price reductions and high salaries for young electricians, as evidence that the private sector can mitigate these distortions, while warning that socialist-style price caps historically create shortages.
Why it matters
Understanding how policy choices affect everyday costs helps voters assess economic arguments and future legislation.
In this story
