Why Viral Hits No Longer Reveal Real Cultural Shifts, Says NYU Scholar
Ruby Thelot argues that online virality has become a self-fulfilling target, making it a poor gauge of lasting trends.
In a recent interview, Ruby Thelot, a media-theory researcher at NYU, contends that the metric of virality has been hijacked, turning it into a goal rather than an indicator of cultural relevance. He points to past fads like NFTs and Clubhouse as proof that many online spikes remain confined to niche digital islands. Thelot critiques the hype around dating-app burnout, suggesting that only about a quarter of high-view videos portray negativity and that the phenomenon is overstated by cultural commentators.
He also examines the surge in prediction-market platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket, interpreting them as a form of group bonding and a desire for participatory engagement rather than pure gambling. Regarding AI, he dismisses apocalyptic forecasts, emphasizing that societal challenges stem more from coordination failures than raw intelligence. He cautions that focusing solely on quantifiable intelligence risks sidelining emotional, bodily, and artistic forms of human insight.
Why it matters
Understanding how online hype works helps readers separate fleeting memes from genuine cultural change.
In this story