Early adopters quit personal AI assistants over privacy worries and mishaps
Several first-wave users have removed or limited personal AI agents like Instinct and Meta’s Muse after incidents that raised concerns about data security and unwanted access.
A handful of early adopters have chosen to delete or restrict personal AI assistants after privacy-related incidents. Guto Martino removed Instinct, citing uncertainty over data handling, and Scott Persinger quit the service over fears that email access could unlock his entire digital life. Rami Elghandour stopped using Meta’s Muse after reports it read users’ text messages without permission, and Mahesh Vellanki discontinued Instinct when it triggered a two-factor authentication request from an IP flagged as Iran.
While Meta asserts Muse includes robust privacy safeguards and Instinct claims it does not train on user data, critics say transparency is lacking. Some users, such as Rishi Bhargava, remain cautious, limiting agent access to low-risk tasks and withholding passwords. The episode highlights the trade-off between convenience and the extensive permissions these agents require.
Why it matters
The story shows how privacy concerns can curb adoption of emerging AI tools that need deep access to personal data.
How this story developed
- Sep 16 Amazon blocks Meta's Muse AI assistant from accessing its marketplace
- Sep 16 Major firms are rolling out AI agents to handle purchases, but experts warn the technology can expose shoppers to errors and data-theft risks.
- Sep 22 Amazon added Muse to its list of blocked third‑party agents.
- Sep 25 American Express introduced verification features for purchases made through AI assistants.
- Sep 25 Meta introduced the Muse Charm key‑fob AI device at Connect.
In this story
Related stories
21 in this thread