Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics
CROSS-SPECTRUM

Experts debate legality of pre-marked ballots amid Borlänge election controversy

Legal scholar Joakim Nergelius says accepting pre-crossed voting papers is questionable and may breach election rules, though case law is scarce.

A controversy over allegedly altered V-ballots in Borlänge has highlighted ambiguities in Swedish election law regarding pre-crossed voting papers. Joakim Nergelius, who studies constitutional law at Örebro universitet, initially assumed the practice was prohibited, yet he has heard of cases where county administrative boards and other agencies accepted such ballots. He draws a distinction between hand-marked and machine-marked ballots and argues that allowing pre-crossed papers undermines the principle of voter choice.

While paying voters is clearly illegal, transporting them to polling stations is not, and more extreme coercion is prohibited. The offence under investigation in Dalarna carries a maximum sentence of six months' imprisonment, which Nergelius says should not be dismissed as minor given its impact on democratic integrity.

Why it matters

Clarifying the legality of pre-marked ballots is crucial for safeguarding the integrity of elections.

How this story developed

  1. Sep 21 Police probe alleged vote-rigging involving pre-marked ballots for Vänsterpartiet candidate in Borlänge
  2. Sep 22 Party spokesperson Antonio de la Cruz said the party would not comment on the investigation.
  3. Sep 24 Ali has paused his parliamentary duties pending the outcome of the fraud investigation.

In this story

pre-marked ballotselection fraudSwedish election lawvoter coercionBorlängeDalarnaJoakim Nergeliusmaximum penaltydemocratic process
Get the beta ↗