Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics
CROSS-SPECTRUM

Five judges denounce Constitutional Court ruling on process amnesty as constitutional overreach

Five magistrates criticized the Constitutional Court's order that the Supreme Court grant amnesty to convicted process figures, saying it breaches constitutional structure.

The Constitutional Court’s recent judgment obliges the Supreme Court to extend an amnesty to individuals barred from office for embezzlement linked to the Catalan independence process. The plenary vote, driven by the leftist bloc, passed the measure on Monday. However, five magistrates—Concepción Espejel, Enrique Arnaldo, José María Macías (who stepped down from the Jordi Turull-led report), César Tolosa and Ricardo Enríquez—issued a forceful dissent.

They contend the ruling constitutes a “more than worrying” usurpation of the Supreme Court’s functional role in interpreting ordinary law and exceeds the Constitutional Court’s jurisdiction. The dissent also criticizes the methodological approach used in the protection granted to former minister Dolors Bassa, which would aid Carles Puigdemont. According to the dissenters, the decision deepens a trend that distorts the constitutional architecture established by the Spanish justice system.

Why it matters

The dispute could reshape the balance of power between Spain's top courts and future legal rulings.

In this story

amnestyconstitutional courtsupreme courtjurisdictionprocessembezzlementdissentconstitutional architecturelegal interpretation
Get the beta ↗