Juror recounts unsettling reenactment by holdout during Lindsay Clancy trial
A juror said the lone holdout on the 12-person panel used the same exercise band that killed the children to simulate the strangulation during deliberations.
During deliberations in the Lindsay Clancy murder case, the single juror who opposed a guilty verdict reportedly used the same exercise band employed in the children’s deaths to recreate the strangulation, wrapping it around a water bottle. Juror number 10, Nick Dargie, said the demonstration left the room silent and expressed disgust at the act. He also observed that the holdout appeared inattentive, frequently checking a phone while others spoke.
The deadlock of 11-1 forced the judge to declare a mistrial. Dargie added that while several jurors initially leaned toward conviction, he ultimately found the prosecution’s evidence inconsistent and the defense experts more credible. The case involves Lindsay and Patrick Clancy and their three children, Cora, Dawson and Callan.
Why it matters
The juror’s account highlights unusual courtroom behavior that contributed to a mistrial in a high-profile murder case.
How this story developed
- Aug 19 Defense psychologist argues Lindsay Clancy lacked criminal intent due to postpartum psychosis
- Aug 21 A defense psychologist testified about Clancy’s bipolar disorder and postpartum psychosis.
- Aug 24 Prosecutors presented rebuttal witnesses after the defense rested.
- Aug 26 Prosecution called Dr. Avram Mack as a rebuttal witness who testified Clancy understood the wrongfulness of her conduct.
- Aug 29 Jurors convened Thursday to decide whether Clancy bears criminal liability.
- Aug 31 Jury began third day of deliberations in the case
- Aug 31 Jury resumed deliberations on Tuesday after failing to reach a verdict on Monday.
- Sep 2 Dawn Light was arrested outside the courthouse and charged with intimidation of a witness, juror, or person providing information.
- Sep 3 The jury reported a second deadlock in the trial.
- Sep 4 Defense counsel requested dismissal of a holdout juror after the foreperson’s note indicated the juror was not following the judge’s guidance on reasonable doubt.
In this story
Related stories
13 in this thread