Justice Department defends USPS mail-ballot rule amid court challenges
The Justice Department filed a robust opposition to requests that block a new USPS rule tightening mail-in voting requirements, while a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order against the administration’s broader voting restrictions.
In a late-night filing, the Justice Department presented its most comprehensive defense of a final United States Postal Service rule that mandates new ballot envelope specifications and establishes a federal database of absentee-ballot requests, asserting that the Postal Service has long exercised comparable authority over other sensitive mail. The filing responded to lawsuits from pro-voting rights organizations and several blue states seeking a federal injunction, which they argue would let the USPS reject ballots for voters appearing on a non-statutory list.
The League of Women Voters of Massachusetts criticized the rule as an unlawful mechanism to deny mail delivery to eligible voters. Separately, a federal district judge issued a temporary order blocking a separate Trump administration directive that imposed extensive mail-voting restrictions, indicating the dispute will likely ascend to the Supreme Court. Legal analysts note the outcome could shape how mail-in voting operates in upcoming midterm elections.
Former Homeland Security adviser Miles Taylor has suggested the administration may be pursuing additional, undisclosed tactics to influence the election. The combined legal challenges highlight a contentious fight over voting access and postal authority.
Why it matters
The case could determine whether new postal rules limit mail-in voting in upcoming elections.
How this story developed
- Aug 22 Supreme Court Halts Lower Court Block on Trump Mail-Voting Order Amid Implementation Hurdles
- Aug 25 Supreme Court lifted the June injunction but left a second injunction in place, keeping parts of the order blocked.
- Aug 26 Governor Gavin Newsom announced that California will file a new lawsuit to block the federal mail‑in voting rules.
- Aug 26 Around two dozen Democratic-run states have filed a new lawsuit against the U.S. Postal Service, seeking to block President Trump’s order that would limit mail voting in the upcoming midterm elections.
- Aug 26 The Supreme Court voted 6‑3 to lift a prior stay on the USPS rule.
- Aug 27 The Supreme Court forced Judge Talwani to vacate the earlier injunction, allowing the USPS rule to take effect pending the lawsuit.
- Aug 28 USPS announced it is now applying the new mail‑ballot handling requirements.
- Aug 28 Judge Indira Talwani ordered a 14‑day halt to enforcement of the executive order.
- Aug 28 U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani granted a 14‑day temporary restraining order blocking enforcement of the new USPS mail‑ballot regulation.
- Aug 28 A U.S. district judge declined to block President Donald Trump's updated order on birthright citizenship, despite doubts about its constitutionality.
- Aug 28 Trump signed a revised birthright citizenship order earlier this month.
- Aug 29 U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein denied Trump’s third request to transfer the New York hush‑money case to federal court.
- Aug 29 Utah senators and a representative publicly praised the Supreme Court’s ruling and defended the state’s mail‑in voting system.
In this story
Related stories
7 in this thread