Neighbors say Sussexes slipped out of Montecito quietly, sparking mixed reactions
Montecito residents report that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle left their $14 million home for the UK without fanfare, and opinions about their stay vary widely.
Neighbors in Montecito observed that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle vacated their $14 million estate for the United Kingdom with virtually no public notice, prompting a description of the exit as a "whimper, not a bang." One resident said no moving trucks or parties were seen, and another recalled only brief glimpses of the couple, such as Harry on a bike and Meghan driving a Range Rover. A local who attempted to leave a welcoming bottle of wine reported it was returned unopened, reinforcing the sense that the Sussexes kept to themselves.
The community bookstore has removed their products, and a boutique owner noted the family’s titles hold more weight in Britain than in California. Opinions among neighbors range from understanding the move for their children’s status to outright relief, with some accusing the pair of demanding favors without giving back to the area.
Why it matters
The story highlights how high-profile figures can affect local community dynamics and public perception.
How this story developed
- Aug 19 Prince Harry and Meghan set to relocate to the United Kingdom
- Aug 20 The couple have now indicated a move back to the UK within weeks.
- Aug 20 Prime Minister Andy Burnham said security provisions for the Sussexes are a private matter.
- Aug 21 Prince Harry and Meghan have landed in the United Kingdom.
- Aug 21 Tax experts say the couple will forfeit four years of foreign income and gains relief and lose inheritance‑tax protection, exposing millions of dollars to a rate of up to 40 percent.
- Aug 22 Harry said returning to Britain was “impossible” yet announced plans to move back at the end of August.
- Aug 24 A new poll shows 68% of respondents want the couple to fund their own security while only 2% support taxpayer‑funded protection.
- Aug 26 A court ruling denied the Sussexes publicly funded protection, sparking debate over who will pay for their security.
In this story
Related stories
10 in this thread