Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics
CROSS-SPECTRUM

PP criticises government spending priorities amid disability aid debate

PP deputy Carmen Fúnez accused the government of favouring funds for illegal migrants in Ceuta over assistance for families with seriously ill children and ALS patients during a parliamentary debate on disability reforms.

In a debate on the major reform of Spain's Disability and Dependency law, Carmen Fúnez, vice-secretary of Health and Social Policy for the Partido Popular, denounced the government's spending choices. She argued that funds are being used to provide Wi-Fi to illegal migrants in Ceuta, while families with children suffering from cancer or other serious conditions receive insufficient support. Fúnez also accused the executive of blocking Senate-approved amendments that would remove co-payments for ALS patients and align disability benefits with other aid schemes.

She pointed to the government's allocation of large sums to institutional advertising, advisory staff and CIS polling, contrasting it with the lack of resources for the affected families. Fúnez called on minister Félix Bolaños to show respect for the families present in the chamber, who seek to maintain care assistance beyond the age limit of 26. The PP framed the Senate veto as a political rebuff to Parliament and noted the government's failure to present a state budget in the lower house during one outlet term.

Why it matters

The dispute highlights how budget priorities affect vulnerable patients and could shape Spain's disability policy.

How this story developed

  1. Sep 10 Spain's Supreme Court suspends electoral registrations tied to controversial 'grandchildren' law
  2. Sep 13 The court’s injunction now requires applicants to provide proof that their ancestors were exiles.

In this story

disability reformfamily assistanceALSillegal migrantsbudget allocationParliament debate
Get the beta ↗