Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics
CROSS-SPECTRUMBROAD COVERAGE

Spain's National Court grants amnesty to 12 CDR activists charged with terrorism

The Audiencia Nacional has cleared twelve members of the Comités de Defensa de la República of terrorism charges, invoking the EU court’s ruling on the Catalan “olvido penal.”

A brief ruling by the Audiencia Nacional has granted amnesty to the twelve activists of the Comités de Defensa de la República who were accused of belonging to a terrorist organization, causing damage and possessing explosives. The court cited the legal reasoning of the European Court of Justice, which mandated that the amnesty law incorporate the facts underlying the CDR case. This decision arrives three months after the EU affirmed the criminal “forgetting” of the Catalan independence process and after the Spanish parliament approved the amnesty law in June 2024.

Earlier, the National Court had expressed doubts that the law might conflict with EU directives, prompting it to refer the matter to Luxembourg for clarification. European judges rejected those concerns, stating the law does not undermine the EU directive because the CDR actions did not involve serious human-rights violations. While the CDR case is now permanently closed, the Supreme Court has denied amnesty to Carles Puigdemont and Oriol Junqueras, with the Constitutional Court ordering a partial reversal for Junqueras only.

Why it matters

The ruling ends a high-profile terrorism case linked to Catalan independence, highlighting tensions between Spanish courts and EU legal standards.

How the sides frame it

MODERATE AGREEMENT

All camps report that the National Court granted amnesty to the twelve CDR members, but left and centre coverage present the decision as a straightforward legal outcome, while right-leaning coverage stresses the defendants' terrorism charges and labels the amnesty law as controversial.

LEFT

Reports the amnesty decision and highlights the European Court of Justice’s legal reasoning that underpins it.

CENTER

Simply notes the court’s granting of amnesty to the twelve individuals, listing their names and confirming the procedural details.

RIGHT

Frames the ruling as a release of people faced with serious terrorism charges, describing the group as a radical pro-independence network and calling the amnesty law controversial.

The left emphasises

  • court cited the legal reasoning of the European Court of Justice
  • decision follows EU affirmation and parliament’s approval of the amnesty law

The right emphasises

  • describes the defendants as a radical pro-independence network
  • highlights serious terrorism charges and prosecutor’s request for 8-27-year sentences
  • calls the amnesty law controversial

In this story

amnestyCDRterrorism chargesEU court rulingolvido penalCatalan independenceSpanish judiciarylaw of amnestySupreme Court opposition
Get the beta ↗