Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Sport

FIA Appeals Court Defends Judges' Independence After Briatore's Allegations

The FIA’s top judicial body rejected Alpine chief Flavio Briatore’s claim that a judge in the appeal over Pierre Gasly’s Monaco penalty had ties to McLaren, affirming the judges’ impartiality.

Flavio Briatore, head of Alpine, claimed that a judge on the FIA Court of Appeal had connections to McLaren, suggesting bias in the ruling that restored a penalty on Pierre Gasly after the Monaco Grand Prix. The FIA’s highest legal authority countered, stating that appeal judges are bound by independence and confidentiality requirements, file annual interest disclosures, and sign specific independence declarations for each case.

It added that both McLaren and Red Bull, the parties to the dispute, were invited to raise any concerns about the judges before and after the hearing, but none were made. No objections were noted regarding how witnesses were questioned or how the proceedings were conducted. The appeal resulted in Gasly dropping to seventh place, while Red Bull’s Isack Hadjar moved to third, McLaren’s Oscar Piastri to fourth, and Racing Bulls’ Liam Lawson and Arvid Lindblad to fifth and sixth. Briatore’s remarks, based on a 2018 charity auction attended by the judge, were rebuffed by McLaren, whose team principal Andrea Stella called the allegations insulting and without merit.

Why it matters

The dispute tests the perceived fairness of motorsport’s top judicial system and could affect team confidence in FIA rulings.

How this story developed

  1. Sep 3 Kimi Antonelli vows aggressive comeback after starting last at Monza
  2. Sep 4 Russell topped the final practice session.

In this story

FIA Court of Appealjudicial independenceAlpineMcLarenMonaco Grand Prixpenalty reinstatedteam allegationssports governance
Get the beta ↗