Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Supreme Court rebuffs opposition meeting request, warns against politicising the bench

The Supreme Court, led by CJI Surya Kant, turned down a private meeting request from opposition leaders and warned that courts must not become political battlegrounds.

On Monday, a bench headed by CJI Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana reiterated that the Supreme Court must not be drawn into political conflicts, rejecting a private audience request from opposition figures Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge. Kant stressed the court’s duty to hear cases against the Election Commission and the SIR, promising priority treatment. The bench also cautioned against allowing political parties to use the courtroom as a battlefield while hearing a writ petition by senior advocate Atmaram Nadkarni, who complained that protests blocked his ability to represent a client in international arbitration.

SCBA president Pradeep Rai emphasized that the right to protest must coexist with the right of citizens to move freely, and the court set both petitions for hearing on Tuesday alongside complaints from MPs M A Baby, Manoj Jha, Menaka Guruswamy and others alleging police overreach. Additional submissions from advocate G Sankaranarayanan highlighted concerns over the detention of senior advocate Shadan Farasat and called for police restraint. Kant concluded that protests should be confined to designated locations, keeping the court’s premises free from political strife.

Why it matters

It underscores the judiciary's effort to maintain independence and prevent courts from being used as political tools.

In this story

Supreme Courtpolitical interferenceprotestlawyersseparation of powerscourt restraintpetitionspolice force
Get the beta ↗